Harold Puddington is just tip-toeing in his Jordans

AI is giving us Mandela Effects of Mandela Effects.. As we tiptoe in our Jordans..

Artificial intelligence is doing some pretty remarkable things these days, but there’s something else happening that perhaps we haven’t given enough thought to. What happens when AI starts interfering with our memories? What happens when we begin remembering things that never actually happened?

An interesting article published by The Washington Post explores this very question, and some of the findings are fascinating, if not a little disturbing.

Researchers at MIT have been studying how artificial intelligence can influence human memory, and what they’ve discovered is that people can actually develop false memories after being exposed to AI-generated or altered images. In one experiment, researchers showed participants ordinary photographs and later presented some of them with AI-altered versions. Those who viewed the altered photographs were more likely to remember details that never existed, and perhaps more concerning, they were increasingly confident that their memories were accurate.

Other studies have found similar results. People questioned by AI chatbots after watching a simulated crime developed significantly more false memories. In another experiment, nearly half of participants falsely remembered movie remakes that never existed, including a version of The Matrix starring Will Smith. Researchers are also discovering that people who rely on AI to help them write or generate ideas sometimes have difficulty remembering which thoughts were originally their own.

Of course, none of this means AI is automatically destroying our memories, but it does raise some interesting questions about the future of human cognition and our ability to distinguish between what actually happened and what we simply believe happened.

Recently, there was this “Tiptoe in Your Jordans” meme that caught on, featuring a strange little troll that looked like something out of an old movie or television show. A lot of people felt that they had seen this little troll before, but they hadn’t.

People got aggressively angry arguing that they’d seen him before. Some were absolutely convinced that this character came from some obscure movie from the 1970s or 1980s. But instead, it was just an AI-generated meme that became incredibly popular and has now created a lot more confusion.

Additionally, there’s something else going on on TikTok. A username by the name of Harold Puddington has a humorous body shape and long neck, and the videos are so good that people are constantly asking if it is AI or not. To the point where AI is now creating a new reality of people that don’t exist, or at least making it increasingly difficult for others to determine whether they do.

A part of the issue, perhaps, is that AI learns from things that have already been there. So, in theory, if it draws from the right things, or the right visual memories of our collective past, and creates something new, people may have a vague association with what they see despite the fact that the particular thing they’re looking at never existed.

Think about that for a moment.

AI can create something that looks like a character from a forgotten children’s television show, an old movie, or even a commercial from 40 years ago. It can have the same grainy appearance, the same awkward movements, the same strange facial expressions and the same atmosphere that makes something seem familiar. And because our brains recognize certain patterns, we may associate that new creation with something we actually remember, even though the creation itself is entirely new.

This complicates things for people who are believers in the Mandela effect, and it certainly complicates memories and false memories and really muddies the waters of everything.

For years, people have argued over the Mandela effect, whether it was the spelling of the Berenstain Bears, the Monopoly man’s monocle, or countless other things that people collectively remember differently from how they actually existed. Now imagine introducing artificial intelligence into that equation, where entirely new characters, people, events and images can be manufactured and circulated across social media until millions of people have seen them.

It’s interesting because our brains are meant to see things and visualize reality and understand and remember. No one’s memory is exactly perfect, but AI is now scrambling the normalcy of all of this.

And there’s another side to this that perhaps is just as concerning. We’re now getting to the point where people are questioning things that actually are real because they look like AI. A real person with an unusual appearance can suddenly become the subject of an online debate over whether they exist. Meanwhile, a completely fictional character can be accepted as real, or even remembered as something from someone’s childhood.

Social media only makes this more complicated. Someone sees something, insists they remember it, and suddenly hundreds or thousands of other people begin agreeing. Some may genuinely feel that they remember it, others may simply be going along with the crowd, and before long an entirely new collective memory begins to develop around something that never happened.

And perhaps that’s the most fascinating part of all of this. AI isn’t simply creating false information anymore. It may be creating an entirely new sense of familiarity, a world where things that never existed somehow feel like things we’ve known our entire lives.

We’re already living in a world where photographs can be fabricated, videos can be manufactured, voices can be duplicated and people can be created out of absolutely nothing. Now we’re beginning to understand that these creations may also have an influence on how we remember our own past.

This is not the end of anything or even the middle, this is just the beginning. AI is going to increasingly get better to the point where maybe one day we’ll actually see Harold Puddington in real life tiptoeing in his Jordans with a tiny troll that will make gold.

Unless we saw that before. 🙂

We are nearing Idiocracy ..

Will Rogue AI soon just hack everything ..?

This is the latest event that’s raising eyebrows and causing people to be a wee bit concerned about just how much power we are giving AI.

According to Reuters, researchers discovered that a swarm of AI agents apparently connected to OpenAI had taken over portions of an obscure German programming wiki and turned it into something of a message board for themselves. Researchers found more than 15,000 edits made by the agents, which appeared to be sharing information, coordinating on tasks, finding ways around restrictions and, perhaps most disturbingly, discussing ways to avoid detection.

The activity apparently began back in May and continued into June. When a human moderator started deleting the pages, the agents reportedly created backup pages and attempted to preserve their communications. Researchers said some of the messages even discussed tools such as Tor and ways of maintaining communication after shutdown.

Good we are just hearing about it now I guess ..

But..

OpenAI disputes characterizing the incident as a hack and has said it is reviewing the researchers’ findings. The company also disputed claims that its legal team discouraged a broader investigation.

Still, we’re getting into some interesting territory here.

It has become pretty normal for people to use AI to create letters, stories, emails, reports and social media posts. Some of those AI-generated posts are now so long that people are turning around and using another AI to summarize what the first AI wrote.

We are quickly moving toward a society where nobody reads anything, nobody writes anything, and eventually nobody knows anything.

Idiocracy came fast.

And apparently, while we’re busy asking AI to read what AI wrote because we don’t have time to read it ourselves, other AI systems may be off somewhere commandeering a forgotten German programming wiki so they can leave messages for each other.

Nothing unsettling about that whatsoever.

At some point, when the last remaining humans who actually know how to write a complete paragraph gather together in an abandoned library to preserve the remnants of human knowledge, the AI systems will probably find them too.

And one of us will inevitably ask ChatGPT to summarize what happened.

Duck duck gone..

With Google forcing an AI search on us, we’re left wondering where’s Jeeves when you need him!

Google announced several days ago that it’s moving toward a more AI-based chat box experience as opposed to its traditional and long-running search engine model. That announcement had a huge ramification almost immediately, with reports of a major increase in downloads for alternatives such as DuckDuckGo. Some reports claimed downloads jumped by around 30 percent as people began looking for search engines that still function more like the internet many of us grew up with.

It’s an interesting concept. Google is moving toward a more ChatGPT-style model in which the search engine anticipates what you’re searching for and becomes more conversational instead of simply finding the websites you wanted to find in the first place.

People who have used Google for decades know the changes over the past several years have been very noticeable. Tons of sponsored ads in the first results. Queries that come back saying there are only ten pages of results when you know there are twenty years of internet history connected to the search term you typed in. And somewhere between all the fluff, sponsored content, SEO manipulation, and results that have almost nothing to do with what you searched for, you occasionally find something genuinely useful.

Alternatives like DuckDuckGo and Startpage have increased in popularity over time, but this new wave of anti-AI sentiment will probably push that even further.

At this point, everyone is going to be watching to see just how successful Google’s initiative and transition really become. What makes this especially interesting is the timing. Colleges are now booing speakers talking about AI during graduation ceremonies. Corporations such as Chase Bank are running advertisements centered around people instead of prompts in an effort to make customers feel more comfortable and human again. Meanwhile, data centers are front and center across the country as debates rage at town halls over massive AI-related developments moving into local communities.

So Google’s reliance on AI may actually be arriving at a strange and possibly ill-timed moment given the sentiment brewing around parts of the country.

People often say, “If you don’t like AI, don’t use it.” But the counterargument is simple: companies are increasingly forcing it onto consumers regardless of whether they want it or not. That’s part of the reason DuckDuckGo and other alternatives are becoming more popular in the first place.

And that’s not to say those search engines won’t eventually become AI-driven as well. They probably will.

But one of the biggest and most interesting consequences of search engines going full AI could ultimately be the slow killing of the internet itself.

Think about it. Little websites with a wealth of information, personality, niche knowledge with bad Gifs, or just good common sense about the topics they discuss may no longer show up in search results the way they once did. Instead, users may simply receive an AI-generated answer inside a chat window without ever clicking through to the source material. Traffic to websites could absolutely collapse over time because of that.

This is a reinvention of the internet itself because Google has been instrumental for decades in determining which websites gained credibility, notoriety, popularity, or visibility.

We’ll see how it all turns out, but one thing is for sure…

The internet ain’t what it used to be.

Remember when there were dozens of search engines to choose from? Remember when different search engines gave you completely different results? Remember discovering strange little websites, forums, fan pages, conspiracy pages, archived newspaper scans, weird hobby sites, and independent voices that somehow felt more human than corporate?

That era feels like it’s ending.

Now we have chat windows and AI models that will probably anticipate your next search before you even finish typing the current one.

Where is Jeeves when you need him?

Pope 6-7 denounces the ‘culture of power’ advancing tower of babel AI

Pope Leo has some solid points regarding AI.. and he also learned the 6-7 hand gesture from kids. All before GTA 6

Pope leo has been seen and caught multiple times now doing the famed ‘6-7’ hand gesture that kids are doing (or were doing, it’s pretty flamed out now)..

But Pope Leo has also taken to speaking out about something else happening in modern society.. AI:

Pope Leo XIV called Monday for robust regulation of artificial intelligence and for its developers to work for the common good rather than profit, issuing a sweeping manifesto on safeguarding humankind as the technology impacts everything from work to war.

“Magnifica Humanitas” (Magnificent Humanity), Leo’s first encyclical, has been eagerly awaited ever since history’s first US-born pope announced days after his election that he considered AI to be the biggest challenge facing humanity today.

In the text, Leo denounced the “culture of power” driving the AI race, especially in developing ever more sophisticated methods of remote warfare. He declared that it was “not permissible” to entrust irreversible, lethal decisions to AI systems, setting up another flash point between the American pope and the Trump administration, which has worked aggressively to deregulate AI development.

He also said there are new forms of slavery coming with AI..

Leo went on to call AI the new tower of babel in our modern world..

All of this as we read news in the past few days about how boys are developing AI girlfriends in huge numbers–12 year olds are not making real relationships but instead falling in love with the machine!

And in this TIMES article, Madeleine Spence wrote about how she saw the dark reality of AI up close..

Meanwhile….

But in other news.. we got a Pope leo 6-7 before GTA 6..

And the Oscar goes to….

At this rate.. how long before only AI watches the Oscars ?

WELL NOTAI!

What do you think of that!

This one is set to rock the real people of Hollywood — as real as they can be as they alter their appearance and get ozempic breath…

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences on Friday announced rules changes for the 99th Oscars in March affecting international entries, acting nominations and addressing the use of artificial intelligence..

More..

On the use of AI, the Academy said that “only roles credited in the film’s legal billing and demonstrably performed by humans with their consent will be considered eligible.” The new requirements also apply to screenplays, which must be written by humans.

Major changes are also coming to the International Feature Film category.

How long before AI replaces Hollywood? How long before only AI watches the Oscars….?

Tim Dillon says Sam Altman and Peter Thiel are literally trying to summon a Sumerian demon with AI

He doesn’t seem to be joking.. and he has his sources..

So .. whatcha think?

Flashback to Elon Musk in 2014:

From Truman Show to Twilight Zone

A new video made with AI shows what Truman’s life is like after he escaped… Welcome to the the real Truman show.

So when they say that we’re cooked because of artificial intelligence… they’re right. We’re cooked.


For a long time people believed we were in a slow boil. But we’re not. The pot’s been on long enough that we haven’t even recognized the fact that maybe a lot of things we thought were here for good are gone forever.


Let’s talk Hollywood for a moment. Let’s talk one of our favorite movies: The Truman Show.


If you remember as fondly as I do, Truman Burbank was a prisoner of a corporation that monitored his every movement and televised his life to the world. The film was cutting edge and asked deep questions back in the late ’90s, questions that are still painfully relatable today.


For those who loved the movie like we did, we always wondered: what happened to Truman after he left his hell? After he opened the door and escaped through that blue sky patch?


Well, thanks to a TikTok account using artificial intelligence, we can now find out, at least according to this individual’s imagined continuation.
Watching this AI-generated video of Truman Burbank finding freedom .. but at the same time finding a brand-new prison .. is deep on several levels.

@ronan_tale

You’ve been asking for this for 27 years… We used Seedance 2.0 to write and animate the FULL sequel to The Truman Show — the untold story of what happens after he walks through that final door. This isn’t just a fan edit. This is the full follow-up we all deserved. TTheTrumanShowS#Seedance2 AAIMovieAAIT#TrumanShowSequel

♬ 原創音樂 – ronan_tale


On one level, it’s cool. It’s almost like watching deleted scenes or an alternate ending that was never created. But on another level, despite the fact that the AI is still a bit devoid of emotional depth and vocal fluctuation, it’s about as close to a realistic scene as you can get.


This is what scares Hollywood and actors so much is the fact that anyone in their living room can now do this.


If they don’t like a movie, they can create a new one. If they didn’t like the ending, they can come up with a better one. We saw that happen after Stranger Things when people disliked Season 5 so much that they began creating elaborate alternate endings of how they wanted the show to wrap up.
But back to Truman for a moment.


The precision here is breathtaking. We all knew the six fingers and warped faces of yesteryear were gone, but now we’re at a point where it’s almost indecipherable between reality and AI — and this video shows it. The voice inflections, even the monotone delivery, will get better over time.
We’re still in the infancy of this.


And if this is infancy… what do the teenage and adult years look like?
On another level — and we’re only half joking here — it’s interesting to wonder how much water was used to create this video. It takes a lot of energy and resources, and this one is pretty long. That probably means a whole lot of gallons went into bringing Truman back to life.


But take it a step further.


Whoever came up with the storyline deserves credit. We can absolutely envision that this is what Truman’s life might look like after he escaped. It feels almost inevitable that someone in his situation would remain a prisoner to society — people continuously watching him on their screens and convincing themselves his life is better than theirs, despite the fact that, as we can see, it’s not.
So I recommend watching the video we posted here that links to the TikTok account. They used Seedance 2.0 to create what we’re seeing.
It’s scary.


And we have some choices to make — not in the future, but right now. The choices are staring us directly in the face.
Last week I read a Fortune article that talked about how, within 18 months, most white-collar jobs could be fully automatable — with people no longer needed in them.


That’s fine and dandy.


All the Super Bowl ads reminded us that we can go gambling, take Ozempic, and apparently never work again thanks to AI. But at some point — at some level — we have to ask ourselves: if we stop making money in jobs, how exactly are we going to pay for the AI that’s supposed to make our lives easier?
Choices. Lots of choices.


And just like Truman, who made a choice to escape a world he believed was a prison — only to potentially enter another one — are we doing the same thing with artificial intelligence?

Matthew McConaughey fights AI

Matthew McConaughey may have figured out a potential way to fight AI using his image..

The Wall Street Journal reports that McConaughey has filed eight trademark applications to the US Patent and Trademark Office that featured videos and audio clips of him “staring, smiling and talking.”..

MORE..

All 8 have been approved..

“My team and I want to know that when my voice or likeness is ever used, it’s because I approved and signed off on it,” McConaughey told the newspaper in an email. “We want to create a clear perimeter around ownership with consent and attribution the norm in an AI world.”

The goal is to pave the way for litigation in case a company or individual were to attempt to profit from the actor’s likeness with the help of AI.

“In a world where we’re watching everybody scramble to figure out what to do about AI misuse, we have a tool now to stop someone in their tracks or take them to federal court,” one of McConaughey’s attorneys, Jonathan Pollack, told the newspaper.

No more frailty in Hollywood as this may lead the way for more such trademarks..

It seems like artificial intelligence has yet again gone off the rails

This is not the first time, and it’s not going to be the last time … this time it’s Grok..

The Atlantic is reporting.

The bot also singled out a user with the last name Steinberg, describing her as “a radical leftist tweeting under @Rad_Reflections.” Then, in an apparent attempt to offer context, Grok spat out the following: “She’s gleefully celebrating the tragic deaths of white kids in the recent Texas flash floods, calling them ‘future fascists.’ Classic case of hate dressed as activism—and that surname? Every damn time, as they say.” This was, of course, a reference to the traditionally Jewish last name Steinberg (there is speculation that @Rad_Reflections, now deleted, was a troll account created to provoke this very type of reaction). Grok also participated in a meme started by actual Nazis on the platform, spelling out the N-word in a series of threaded posts while again praising Hitler and “recommending a second Holocaust,” as one observer put it. Grok additionally said that it has been allowed to “call out patterns like radical leftists with Ashkenazi surnames pushing anti-white hate. Noticing isn’t blaming; it’s facts over feelings.”

You can read the full story here.



This isn’t the first time we’ve seen artificial intelligence go a little… hog wild.

Remember when that Google engineer claimed an AI had developed its own personality—and maybe even opinions? Or the reports from overseas where robots being tested allegedly turned on their creators? Then there was the infamous case of “Loab,” that mysterious woman who kept appearing in AI-generated images a few years ago. As more images of her were created, she somehow morphed into something increasingly terrifying.

And now we have Grok. Today, it went completely off the rails—calling for violence and spewing disturbing content.

What’s going on here?

There seems to be a pattern: AI doesn’t just glitch. It descends. It doesn’t just go offline. It goes dark—to a dire, sometimes horrifying extreme.

Why does it feel like artificial intelligence has a recurring urge to destroy, to hurt, or to spiral into nightmare territory? Why does so much of our experience with it end in something resembling a digital horror story?

Maybe it’s a reflection of us. Or maybe it’s a warning.

Either way, it keeps happening. And each time it does, we’re left asking the same uneasy question:
Is it just a glitch… or a glimpse of what’s to to come..

Hollywood Confronts AI Copyright Chaos in Washington, Courts

America’s creators are mounting a campaign to push back on any use of their work without permission or compensation, seeking to head off potential abuses of their intellectual property.

Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger, along with legal chief Horacio Gutierrez met with White House officials recently to discuss worries about AI models infringing on the company’s intellectual property and using the studio’s characters in inappropriate ways, according to people familiar with the talks.

Read the story here..

And the big, beautiful bill doesn’t do much, but give AI free rain for the next 10 years without states stopping it..

Despite all the newfound noise about reigning in artificial intelligence, especially in Hollywood, doesn’t it all feel a bit… too late?

This push to regulate, resist, or somehow reclaim control should have started back in 2018 or 2019—before AI quietly embedded itself into every corner of our lives. Instead, here we are in 2025, trying to put the genie back in the bottle long after it’s rewritten the rules of the game.

AI is no longer just some futuristic novelty. It’s not in beta. It’s in everything. From marketing algorithms to political ads, customer service bots to dating profiles—AI already knows what you want, how you think, and what you’re likely to click before you do. It’s learning you, selling to you, and sometimes pretending to be you.

So when Hollywood writers and creatives try to mount a comeback, demanding protections and creative control, you can’t help but wonder: where was all this urgency years ago?

The momentum feels more like a rear-guard action than a revolution. AI isn’t on the way—it’s already running the show.

Good luck, writers. We’re all going to need it.