Category: blog

  • BEATNGU: The two monsters of Jeepers Creepers, 25 years later

    BEATNGU: The two monsters of Jeepers Creepers, 25 years later

    Twenty-five years ago, Jeepers Creepers arrived in theaters and looking back at the movie now means looking at two very different stories at the same time.

    There is the story of Jeepers Creepers itself: a wonderfully strange, genuinely frightening monster movie that arrived at exactly the right moment for horror.

    And then there is the story of Victor Salva.

    Jeepers Creepers opened on August 31, 2001, just days before September 11 would change virtually everything about American life and culture. Horror itself was also at an interesting crossroads. The Scream era had revitalized the slasher movie during the 1990s, but by 2001 the self-aware slasher formula was beginning to run its course. The remake explosion of the 2000s hadn’t really started yet. Neither had the much more brutal wave of horror that would characterize part of the decade.

    And then this new monster movie showed up.

    A brother and sister are driving home from college through the middle of nowhere. An enormous, rusted truck suddenly appears behind them. They encounter a strange man apparently dumping bodies down a pipe beside an abandoned church.

    And for quite a while, nobody watching the movie knows what the hell they’re looking at.

    That’s one of the things that made Jeepers Creepers work so well.

    At first it could almost be a serial-killer movie. Then it becomes something else entirely. The Creeper isn’t a man. He isn’t Michael Myers or Jason Voorhees. He isn’t another wisecracking 1990s slasher villain.

    He’s a monster. Pure and simple..

    The mythology slowly reveals itself: every 23rd spring, for 23 days, this ancient creature emerges to feed on human beings, consuming parts of their bodies that it can then use to regenerate its own.

    Made for roughly $10 million, Jeepers Creepers opened at number one at the American box office. It made approximately $13 million during the three-day weekend and nearly $16 million over the four-day Labor Day period, setting a Labor Day opening record at the time. Worldwide, it ultimately grossed around $59 million.

    The movie actually became the HORROR REPORT’S 2001 movie of the year and proved from this screenshot:

    Two years later, Jeepers Creepers 2 actually broke the Labor Day record established by the original.

    A franchise had been born.

    But there was another story behind Jeepers Creepers, and it had begun long before anyone saw that truck barreling down the highway.

    Victor Salva had already been convicted of sexually abusing a child.

    In 1988, Salva pleaded guilty to charges stemming from his sexual abuse of Nathan Forrest Winters, the 12-year-old star of Salva’s 1989 movie Clownhouse. Salva had also videotaped one of the encounters. He was sentenced to three years in prison and served approximately 15 months.

    That distinction needs to be made clearly when discussing this history today: these aren’t allegations that surfaced years after Jeepers Creepers. Salva was convicted.

    And yet he returned to filmmaking.

    Francis Ford Coppola, who had helped finance Clownhouse, continued to support Salva’s career. Salva eventually directed Powder for Disney, released in 1995.

    That movie generated controversy when Winters publicly protested its release and questioned why Hollywood was providing another major filmmaking opportunity to the man who had abused him.

    But Salva continued working.

    And eventually he made Jeepers Creepers.

    There is something worth remembering about 2001, though, particularly for those of us who actually lived through this period rather than discovering these movies decades later through the internet.

    Information didn’t travel the way it does now.

    There was no Twitter. No Facebook. No TikTok. Google itself was only a few years old. You didn’t necessarily watch a movie trailer, immediately search the director’s entire history and then spend the next hour reading thousands of people arguing about whether you should see the movie.

    For a tremendous portion of the audience walking into Jeepers Creepers, Victor Salva was simply a name appearing during the credits.

    I remember even reporting on my own website years later about Jeepers Creepers potentially becoming Victor Salva’s salvation and wondering aloud how much his past should be part of the story. Had punishment occurred? Was forgiveness possible? Was there a point at which somebody was permitted to work again?

    Those were uncomfortable questions then and they remain uncomfortable questions now.

    But history also demonstrates that society goes through cycles of judgment, forgiveness, reconsideration and sometimes judgment again.

    What happened in 2001 wasn’t necessarily widespread acceptance or forgiveness of Victor Salva. For many people, it was simply a lack of widespread knowledge. As the internet matured and information became easier to find, that changed.

    People researched Salva. His conviction became increasingly associated with the franchise he had created. And inevitably, audiences began looking backward at the movies themselves through an entirely different lens.

    Things that might once have seemed merely strange began receiving considerably more scrutiny.

    There is the scene involving a man urinating in the original. There is the second movie and its prolonged focus on a high-school athletic team composed largely of young, muscular male characters. And eventually there would be Jeepers Creepers 3, containing a subplot involving a teenage girl and inappropriate sexual attention from her stepfather.

    It would be irresponsible to declare that every one of those creative decisions reveals something about Salva’s intentions. We cannot know that.

    But it is equally impossible to pretend audiences haven’t reexamined those scenes differently after learning what the filmmaker had done.

    And by the time Jeepers Creepers 3 was being made, everything had changed.

    Production was initially planned for British Columbia in 2016. After Salva’s criminal history received renewed attention, the Union of British Columbia Performers warned actors and talent representatives about his conviction and reminded performers that they could refuse work they considered unsafe.

    Then the casting process created another controversy.

    A casting notice sought an 18-year-old actress to portray a 13-year-old girl whose backstory involved inappropriate sexual advances from her stepfather. Breakdown Services ultimately removed the casting notice and project from its system.

    Suddenly the story surrounding Jeepers Creepers 3 wasn’t simply that the Creeper was coming back.

    Victor Salva’s past was coming back with him.

    And when the movie was screened in 2017, the controversy became even worse.

    Reviewers reported that one version contained dialogue appearing to rationalize the stepfather’s sexual attraction to the teenage character. That dialogue was reportedly removed from the theatrical version, but the damage was already being done.

    There were boycott efforts. A planned Los Angeles screening was canceled amid controversy and threatened protests. Entertainment publications that might once have simply written about another Jeepers Creepers sequel were instead explaining to an entirely new generation what Salva had done.

    And then came an extraordinary piece of historical timing.

    Jeepers Creepers 3 received its theatrical event release on September 26, 2017.

    On October 5 — only nine days later — The New York Times published its investigation into Harvey Weinstein.

    The #MeToo reckoning exploded across Hollywood.

    Suddenly an industry that had spent decades wrestling, sometimes very poorly, with questions about separating artists from their behavior was being forced into a completely different conversation about power, abuse, accountability and who continued receiving opportunities despite their conduct.

    Salva’s conviction was nearly three decades old by then. But the cultural judgment surrounding it was new.

    What may have been overlooked, unknown to much of the public, or considered something for which Salva had served his punishment in 2001 was being reexamined through the completely different cultural lens of 2017.

    And after Jeepers Creepers 3, Victor Salva essentially disappeared from mainstream filmmaking.

    There has been no subsequent Salva-directed feature film released. When the franchise returned in 2022 with Jeepers Creepers: Reborn, Salva wasn’t the director. The monster he created continued without him.

    Which brings this story back to the summer of 2001.

    Because despite everything that subsequently happened to the reputation of its creator, something strange has happened to Jeepers Creepers itself.

    The movie survived.

    And personally, I understand why.

    I remember going to see Jeepers Creepers with friends on a fateful summer night when it came out. I remember driving those long, winding roads to the theater and then driving those same dark roads back home afterward. Before a stop at Perkins when we met a girl who was pretty and nice, and joining the military.. we never saw her again and 9/11 happened just days later. I wonder to this day if she also remembers that strange chance encounter herself…

    If you’ve ever lived somewhere surrounded by mountains, woods and roads that become completely black at night, you’ll understand why Jeepers Creepers was probably the perfect movie to watch before that drive home.

    Jeepers Creepers reinvigorated the enjoyment of horror.

    It wasn’t another slasher. It wasn’t simply trying to outdo the last movie with more blood. Somebody had created an actual monster with its own mythology, its own rules, its own appearance and an instantly recognizable presence.

    After the Scream-dominated era of the 1990s, that felt incredibly refreshing.

    Twenty-five years later, Jeepers Creepers has staying power.

    There remains this strange exception audiences seem willing to make for the movie itself even when they aren’t willing to make that exception for Victor Salva.

    Perhaps that’s because movies ultimately become bigger than the people who make them. Hundreds of people participate in creating a film. Actors give performances. Crews build sets. Musicians create scores. Audiences attach their own memories to what they see.

    And eventually a movie becomes part of somebody else’s life.

    That doesn’t erase what Victor Salva did.

    Nathan Forrest Winters was a child when he was abused, and any retrospective about Salva’s career that treats his conviction as merely an inconvenient footnote would be doing a tremendous disservice to the person who actually suffered because of his actions.

    But acknowledging that history doesn’t require pretending Jeepers Creepers wasn’t important.

    Both things can be true.

    Victor Salva committed terrible crimes against a child, was convicted, served prison time, returned to filmmaking, found enormous success with Jeepers Creepers, and eventually watched public attitudes toward his past change dramatically as a new generation learned what had happened.

    …that’s the complicated legacy we’re left with 25 years later.

    A movie that arrived during the final days of one version of America, just before September 11, at a transitional moment for horror itself. A monster that seemingly came out of nowhere and became an icon. A filmmaker whose disturbing history gradually became inseparable from discussions about his creation.

    And memories of driving home on dark summer roads after seeing something genuinely new.

    Every 23rd spring, for 23 days, the Creeper gets to eat.

    Twenty-five years later, people are still talking about him.

    They’re just talking a lot more about the man who created him, too.

  • The Big 250th what?

    The Big 250th what?

    Yesterday I found myself debating with a few people whether July 2nd or July 4th should really be the official holiday.


    Now yes, we all know it is the 4th of July, but we also know that independence was technically declared on July 2nd. History is complicated like that. The good news is we are Americans, which means accuracy has never stopped us from celebrating an entire weekend anyway.


    And for the last time until 2037, the 4th of July falls on a Saturday. I think there is a song about that somewhere.


    We have lamented quite a bit over the past few weeks about these celebrations, about how things feel different this year and how when you compare images of the Bicentennial in 1976, what we are living through now feels like the Temu version of that event.
    And that is unfortunate because 250 years is a pretty respectable amount of time for a young nation to stay alive.


    Although admittedly, in our current state of national division, there aren’t really too many unifying moments as of late..


    This year the biggest debate seems to be whether Americans should head to Washington, D.C. for the big celebration. Supporters of Donald Trump are saying it is the place to be while critics are arguing it is less of a patriotic gathering and more of an elaborate product placement campaign.


    But that is America. Choose the fireworks display or celebration of your liking. Freedom means having the right to make that choice.
    But the real reason for this post, after all of that unnecessary dialogue to get here, comes from a fascinating new poll released by the Cato Institute–right leaning but as long as the merits and science of the survey are strong, then the results are accurate..


    The survey shows that nearly half of Americans do not know what the 250th anniversary of the United States is actually commemorating.


    Let us start with the good news.

    Eighty-six percent say they are grateful to be Americans.


    Seventy percent say the founding principles of the country are still relevant today.
    Fifty-six percent worry the United States could lose its freedoms within the next 50 years.
    And nearly sixty percent say no political party should ever be trusted with too much power.
    Frankly, that sounds like America in a nutshell.


    But here is the catch! Forty-six percent of Americans apparently do not know what America’s 250th anniversary is even about.
    Only fifty-three percent answered correctly.


    And naturally, when you look deeper into the numbers, the group with the highest percentage of confusion is Generation Z, where sixty-one percent reportedly had no idea what exactly we are commemorating this year.


    Something appears to have gone wrong in school somewhere or something?


    Now before we panic too much, we should acknowledge the source here and remember younger generations have always had gaps in knowledge. I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt because let’s be honest, most generations probably spent their youth not fully understanding everything either.


    The divide gets even more interesting when discussing the Founding Fathers.
    Forty-nine percent of Gen Z sees them as courageous leaders.
    Compare that to eighty-nine percent of seniors.


    We understand why. When you study history, you realize the past was messy, cruel, flawed, and filled with beliefs that do not exactly age well. We can endlessly debate whether it is fair to judge the past through modern lenses.


    But perhaps Gen Z should remember one thing.
    The Founding Fathers were the Gen Z of their time.


    Just picture John Hancock standing up in the Continental Congress screaming “six seven.”
    Picture Benjamin Franklin walking into the room saying, “The vibes are giving independence.”
    If the Founding Fathers were here today, I suspect they would have loved TikTok.
    But they are not here.


    We are.


    And unfortunately, forty-six percent of us are not entirely sure why we are about to do what we are doing this weekend.
    One hundred percent of us, however, will probably eat a hot dog and stare upward saying “ooh” and “ahh” while fireworks explode over a humid July sky.


    Happy Birthday, America.


    I suppose we should all wish each other luck as we head toward 300.

    And as we have said every year since 2019, you can’t spell America without Erica..

  • There’s a secret tape of 1952 DC insiders discussing UFOs

    There’s a secret tape of 1952 DC insiders discussing UFOs

    Experts claim that there’s a long-unheard secret tape of an “Invasion of Washington” UFO briefing – and they say the public could hear it very soon. 

    A tape recording a 1952 conversation between Air Force officials and scientists on unidentified flying objects is soon to be released, Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.) told a room of UFO transparency advocates at Disclosure Forum 2026.

    Here is the full story ..

  • If you’re in Chicago you can go to a scratch and sniff screening of the Substance in a theater ..

    If you’re in Chicago you can go to a scratch and sniff screening of the Substance in a theater ..

    MUBI is hosting an “odorama” scratch-snd-sniff screening for ‘THE SUBSTANCE’ on July 11…

    Upon entry, every attendee will be handed an exclusive, custom-engineered scratch-and-sniff card divided into specific, numbered panels. Audiences must watch the screen closely; when a corresponding cue flashes mid-scene, it’s your green light to scratch the matching card block.

    Fans are guessing what the localized cards contain.. maybe the clinical, sterile sting of laboratory chemicals ..  fresh neon-green stabilizers to the nauseatingly sweet aroma of Hollywood dressing room perfumes, overripe food, and iron-heavy puddles of stage blood..

    https://x.com/i/status/2070589690529321091
  • Backrooms ‘everything must go edition’ coming this week

    Backrooms ‘everything must go edition’ coming this week

    The movie has already become one of the highest grossing horror films of all time .. and now an extra cut is is going to be re-released this week making the film even more potentially popular amongst hardcore fans..

    The studio is giving its breakout horror hit an extended theatrical re-release, dubbed the “Everything Must Go Edition,” arriving Friday, July 3, with 15 minutes of bonus footage and a new runtime of two hours and six minutes…

    Welcome to the world of expansion pack rereleases..

    A24 doing what they can .. 🙂

  • Hopper and daughter return to Netflix

    Hopper and daughter return to Netflix

    Netflix has given a straight-to-series order to a father-daughter espionage thriller starring Stranger Things‘ Millie Bobby Brown and David Harbour from Adolescence co-creator Jack Thorne, A24 and studio-based producer Joe Hipps.

    SPY IN THE BLOOD…

    According to the summary for the new series, “Disgraced FBI agent turned security expert Matt Wolfe is drawn back into the world he left behind when his estranged daughter, Rebecca — now an FBI agent determined to follow in his footsteps — vanishes on a mission, forcing him back into a field that has evolved beyond him.”

    More from the PR being released about the new show:

    “We are delighted to bring this spy drama to life with an extraordinary group of talent we’ve been fortunate to collaborate with before,” Netflix Head of Scripted Series, US and Canada, said. “Jack Thorne’s ability to find the deeply human story inside a thriller is unmatched, and watching Millie Bobby Brown and David Harbour reunite — this time as estranged father and daughter on opposite sides of a crisis — is something audiences are going to love. A24 is the perfect partner to bring this story to our members around the world.”

  • Hey chat gpt, write me a superhero movie..

    Hey chat gpt, write me a superhero movie..

    Get ready for the onslaught of Supergirl reviews and they are not pretty.

    None of them, this movie seems doomed. There’s a few things that are attempting to save it including a theme of a dog being in danger, something that always seems to get the viewers revved up.

    However this go around it appears that the movie is so bad, the script is written so poorly, and apparently the lighting of the film is so harsh on the eyes, that there will be nothing redeeming about this film. It’s expected to be the next summer flop and the studio is already trying to think of a way to defend itself. Here’s one of the best reviews of the worst movie of the summer so far:

  • MAKE LIKE A BOOK AND GET BANNED

    MAKE LIKE A BOOK AND GET BANNED

    There’s a strange little story unfolding right now that says a lot more about us than it does about any single book.


    A controversial French novel, The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail, recently made its way back into the spotlight with an English edition. The book itself has always been divisive, centered around an invasion of migrants and the collapse of Western society. It’s not new. It’s not unknown. But suddenly, it was gone.
    Amazon pulled it.


    Then… just as quietly… it came back after a backlash.. .
    Some people believe the ban was needed.. other decried it .. It is not the first time that Amazon has pulled a book, just this time it was more noticeable..


    The Books That Keep Getting Pulled


    We’re living in a strange time where books—some old, some new, some classics, some uncomfortable—are constantly being challenged, removed, or avoided altogether.


    Here are some of the titles that have been repeatedly banned or challenged in recent years with a bit of a reason why:


    1984 – political themes, control, surveillance
    The Catcher in the Rye – language, rebellion, teenage angst
    Adventures of Huckleberry Finn – racial language and historical context
    The Perks of Being a Wallflower – trauma, sexuality, mental health
    Looking for Alaska – grief, identity, coming of age
    Gender Queer: A Memoir – gender identity and sexuality
    A Clockwork Orange – violence and disturbing themes
    Crank – drug use and addiction
    Forever… – teenage sexuality
    It – violence, horror, and controversial scenes involving children

    As a matter of fact, horror author Stephen King bragged the title of the MOST BANNED author in United States schools in general!


    Some of these books are decades old. Some of them were required reading not that long ago. And now, they’re showing up on lists of things that maybe students shouldn’t see.
    So… Who Is Actually Pushing This?


    On one side, you have organizations like PEN America and the American Library Association, actively tracking book bans and pushing back against them. Their argument is pretty simple: access to ideas matters, even the uncomfortable ones.

    On the other side, you have groups like Moms for Liberty and Parents’ Rights in Education, who are advocating for removing certain materials from schools, especially when they involve sexuality, race, or themes they believe are inappropriate for kids.

    And here’s the thing… most of these bans aren’t happening at some massive federal level but instead they’re happening quietly.
    School boards. District decisions and local meetings. Small votes that end up having a huge impact.


    In a lot of ways, this isn’t “top-down censorship.”
    It’s something closer to self-censorship… happening piece by piece.


    So book banning could be true deep mistake..
    Not because every book is good or because every idea deserves to be celebrated. Some ideas are uncomfortable. Some are outdated. Some are even offensive by today’s standards.
    But they existed and they were written, read, and a part of conversations at one point in time.


    And books… especially when you’re young… are a window to the world–the world could bright and happy or dark and dreary.


    They introduce you to ideas you’ve never thought about. Situations you’ve never experienced. Perspectives you might never encounter otherwise.


    I remember reading books in school that pushed boundaries. That made people uncomfortable. That sparked real conversations. And those conversations? They were good. They were controlled. They were thoughtful. There wasn’t hatred in the room.
    Kids aren’t born hateful.


    If anything, school is supposed to be the place where you learn how to think, not what to avoid.


    But now it feels like we’re taking that window… and instead of opening it wider…we’re shutting it, locking it, and then duct taping the edges just to make sure nothing gets through.


    Maybe That Discomfort Matters


    Maybe the point isn’t to agree with every book.
    Maybe the point is to wrestle with them.
    To question them. To push back. To understand why something was written the way it was—and whether it still holds up today.
    Because once you start removing everything that makes people uncomfortable…
    you don’t just lose the bad ideas.
    You lose the conversation entirely.
    And that might be the most dangerous part of all.

  • Dreams before death

    Dreams before death

    While morbid, equally fascinating .. vivid nostalgic dreams are common near the end of life..

    Dreaming is believed to help us process our emotions, store memories, strengthen neural connections, reduce stress, solve problems, and think creatively.

    Vivid dreams happen most often during the rapid eye movement (REM) sleep stage, when the brain is particularly active.

    Some people, especially women, said they were able to recall their dreams more often during the COVID-19 pandemic, which researchers attributed to greater stress, depression, and sleep disruptions.

    Read the full story..

  • Chuck Norris, may he rest in peace

    Chuck Norris, may he rest in peace

    Chuck Norris, the martial arts champion and karate school teacher who jumped fist- and feetfirst into stardom with 1980s action movies like Missing in Action and the long-running CBS drama Walker, Texas Ranger, has died. He was 86.

    Norris died suddenly Thursday in Hawaii after being hospitalized, his family announced in a statement.

    “He lived his life with faith, purpose, and an unwavering commitment to the people he loved. Through his work, discipline, and kindness, he inspired millions around the world and left a lasting impact on so many lives,” they said

    Here’s some good Chuck Norris jokes ..

    1. Chuck Norris doesn’t do push-ups.
      He pushes the Earth down.
      2. Chuck Norris counted to infinity… twice.
      3. Death once had a near-Chuck Norris experience.
      4. When Chuck Norris enters a room, he doesn’t turn the lights on.
      He turns the dark off.
      5. Chuck Norris can divide by zero.
      6. There is no theory of evolution.
      Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris allows to live.
      7. Chuck Norris doesn’t sleep.
      He waits.
      8. Chuck Norris can slam a revolving door.
      9. The boogeyman checks his closet for Chuck Norris.
      10. Chuck Norris once threw a grenade and killed 50 people.
      Then it exploded.