Category: blog

  • MAKE LIKE A BOOK AND GET BANNED

    MAKE LIKE A BOOK AND GET BANNED

    There’s a strange little story unfolding right now that says a lot more about us than it does about any single book.


    A controversial French novel, The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail, recently made its way back into the spotlight with an English edition. The book itself has always been divisive, centered around an invasion of migrants and the collapse of Western society. It’s not new. It’s not unknown. But suddenly, it was gone.
    Amazon pulled it.


    Then… just as quietly… it came back after a backlash.. .
    Some people believe the ban was needed.. other decried it .. It is not the first time that Amazon has pulled a book, just this time it was more noticeable..


    The Books That Keep Getting Pulled


    We’re living in a strange time where books—some old, some new, some classics, some uncomfortable—are constantly being challenged, removed, or avoided altogether.


    Here are some of the titles that have been repeatedly banned or challenged in recent years with a bit of a reason why:


    1984 – political themes, control, surveillance
    The Catcher in the Rye – language, rebellion, teenage angst
    Adventures of Huckleberry Finn – racial language and historical context
    The Perks of Being a Wallflower – trauma, sexuality, mental health
    Looking for Alaska – grief, identity, coming of age
    Gender Queer: A Memoir – gender identity and sexuality
    A Clockwork Orange – violence and disturbing themes
    Crank – drug use and addiction
    Forever… – teenage sexuality
    It – violence, horror, and controversial scenes involving children

    As a matter of fact, horror author Stephen King bragged the title of the MOST BANNED author in United States schools in general!


    Some of these books are decades old. Some of them were required reading not that long ago. And now, they’re showing up on lists of things that maybe students shouldn’t see.
    So… Who Is Actually Pushing This?


    On one side, you have organizations like PEN America and the American Library Association, actively tracking book bans and pushing back against them. Their argument is pretty simple: access to ideas matters, even the uncomfortable ones.

    On the other side, you have groups like Moms for Liberty and Parents’ Rights in Education, who are advocating for removing certain materials from schools, especially when they involve sexuality, race, or themes they believe are inappropriate for kids.

    And here’s the thing… most of these bans aren’t happening at some massive federal level but instead they’re happening quietly.
    School boards. District decisions and local meetings. Small votes that end up having a huge impact.


    In a lot of ways, this isn’t “top-down censorship.”
    It’s something closer to self-censorship… happening piece by piece.


    So book banning could be true deep mistake..
    Not because every book is good or because every idea deserves to be celebrated. Some ideas are uncomfortable. Some are outdated. Some are even offensive by today’s standards.
    But they existed and they were written, read, and a part of conversations at one point in time.


    And books… especially when you’re young… are a window to the world–the world could bright and happy or dark and dreary.


    They introduce you to ideas you’ve never thought about. Situations you’ve never experienced. Perspectives you might never encounter otherwise.


    I remember reading books in school that pushed boundaries. That made people uncomfortable. That sparked real conversations. And those conversations? They were good. They were controlled. They were thoughtful. There wasn’t hatred in the room.
    Kids aren’t born hateful.


    If anything, school is supposed to be the place where you learn how to think, not what to avoid.


    But now it feels like we’re taking that window… and instead of opening it wider…we’re shutting it, locking it, and then duct taping the edges just to make sure nothing gets through.


    Maybe That Discomfort Matters


    Maybe the point isn’t to agree with every book.
    Maybe the point is to wrestle with them.
    To question them. To push back. To understand why something was written the way it was—and whether it still holds up today.
    Because once you start removing everything that makes people uncomfortable…
    you don’t just lose the bad ideas.
    You lose the conversation entirely.
    And that might be the most dangerous part of all.

  • Dreams before death

    Dreams before death

    While morbid, equally fascinating .. vivid nostalgic dreams are common near the end of life..

    Dreaming is believed to help us process our emotions, store memories, strengthen neural connections, reduce stress, solve problems, and think creatively.

    Vivid dreams happen most often during the rapid eye movement (REM) sleep stage, when the brain is particularly active.

    Some people, especially women, said they were able to recall their dreams more often during the COVID-19 pandemic, which researchers attributed to greater stress, depression, and sleep disruptions.

    Read the full story..

  • Chuck Norris, may he rest in peace

    Chuck Norris, may he rest in peace

    Chuck Norris, the martial arts champion and karate school teacher who jumped fist- and feetfirst into stardom with 1980s action movies like Missing in Action and the long-running CBS drama Walker, Texas Ranger, has died. He was 86.

    Norris died suddenly Thursday in Hawaii after being hospitalized, his family announced in a statement.

    “He lived his life with faith, purpose, and an unwavering commitment to the people he loved. Through his work, discipline, and kindness, he inspired millions around the world and left a lasting impact on so many lives,” they said

    Here’s some good Chuck Norris jokes ..

    1. Chuck Norris doesn’t do push-ups.
      He pushes the Earth down.
      2. Chuck Norris counted to infinity… twice.
      3. Death once had a near-Chuck Norris experience.
      4. When Chuck Norris enters a room, he doesn’t turn the lights on.
      He turns the dark off.
      5. Chuck Norris can divide by zero.
      6. There is no theory of evolution.
      Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris allows to live.
      7. Chuck Norris doesn’t sleep.
      He waits.
      8. Chuck Norris can slam a revolving door.
      9. The boogeyman checks his closet for Chuck Norris.
      10. Chuck Norris once threw a grenade and killed 50 people.
      Then it exploded.
  • Get your VPNs ready: A new documentary explains what dad did upstairs

    Get your VPNs ready: A new documentary explains what dad did upstairs

    Don’t Come Upstairs has been showing up across a lot of social media feeds lately. Whether that exposure has been paid for by the documentary’s marketing team or is happening organically isn’t entirely clear, but the film itself has been made to look compelling and very watchable.


    The documentary is centered around a deeply buried family secret that is gradually uncovered by filmmaker Mike Lobel. Through interviews, archival footage, and personal reflection, a long-standing mystery is explored — one that had reportedly been kept hidden for decades. Themes of silence, confrontation, and the emotional weight of unspoken truths are woven throughout the film’s structure.

    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1182842486552728


    Don’t Come Upstairs is a 2025 documentary directed by Mike Lobel and commissioned by CBC in Canada. The film runs just under an hour and has been made available through CBC Gem, the network’s streaming platform. At the time of writing, availability appears to be primarily in Canada, though clips and promotional material have circulated online, contributing to its recent visibility around the planet…


    While it is categorized as a documentary, an unsettling tone is said to linger beneath the surface. The title alone suggests tension, and from the footage that has been shared publicly, an atmosphere of unease appears to have been intentionally crafted. The subject matter seems to blur genre lines, protruding slightly into psychological territory, family drama, and even something adjacent to true-life thriller.


    With a blizzard reportedly on the horizon across parts of the East Coast, at least at the time this post is being written, a window of quiet viewing time may soon be available. Films like this tend to benefit from that kind of stillness.


    So perhaps it should be watched collectively– but don’t be deceived by the links the “full movie” on YouTube.. As mentioned before.. Non Canadians may have a hard time finding this one.

    You will need a VPN..

    It’s a LOT to do for a documentary but maybe worth it?

  • The Faces of Violations of Terms of Service

    The Faces of Violations of Terms of Service

    The infamous Faces of Death franchise is returning and already stirring controversy like the good ole days.


    The upcoming remake, directed by Daniel Goldhaber (Cam) and co-written with Isa Mazzei, is scheduled for theatrical release in 2026. The film reportedly stars Barbie Ferreira, Dacre Montgomery, Josie Totah, Charli XCX, and Jermaine Fowler. This modern reimagining shifts the premise into the internet age, centering on a moderator for a YouTube-like platform who stumbles across disturbing footage that blurs the line between staged horror and possible real-world violence.


    And then came the teaser.


    A grainy, black-and-white trailer surfaced online, featuring brief flashes of extreme and unsettling imagery, scenes involving violent deaths and brutal accidents, presented in a raw, almost documentary style. It was uploaded in a strange, low-key fashion rather than through an obvious official studio channel. Shortly after, YouTube removed it for violating its terms of service, most likely due to graphic content guidelines.
    Which, honestly, feels very on brand for Faces of Death.

    Now those showing the trailer are forced to blur the entire thing (they enjoy this too to drum up the bloodlust prior to the film release)


    This franchise has always lived in that uncomfortable space between taboo and curiosity. In the 1980s and 1990s, it wasn’t something you streamed. It wasn’t trending. It wasn’t algorithm-fed to you. It was whispered about. Passed around on VHS. Rented from questionable corners of video stores. Found at a friend’s house.


    And when you watched it… you weren’t sure what you were seeing.


    There are plenty of jokes about Gen X and early Millennials coming of age on Rotten.com or on Faces of Death tapes as teenagers. I remember an ex-girlfriend of mine tracking down a copy from some friends. We watched a portion of it, and it was appalling — surreal, nightmarish, deeply unsettling. We genuinely couldn’t tell what was real and what wasn’t. We were dumb ’90s kids, and that uncertainty made it even worse.


    As we now know, much of the original footage was staged — though some real archival material was mixed in. That’s what made it so macabre. It wasn’t just gore. It was the ambiguity.


    Now, decades later, the franchise is stepping into the mainstream. But the mainstream doesn’t quite know what to do with it. The pulled YouTube trailer is proof of that friction. In the VHS era, controversy fueled mystique. Today, controversy gets flagged by community guidelines.


    Will the new film be banned in certain circles? Probably debated heavily? Absolutely. Will it be a blockbuster smash? Unlikely. But it may do something more interesting — it could usher a new generation into the cult mythology of Faces of Death.


    Or maybe we’re living in a time where reality already feels grim enough. Maybe the internet has made shock too accessible, too constant. Maybe we don’t need a fictionalized version anymore.
    Then again… maybe that discomfort is exactly the point.

  • Buffy star opines about the return

    Buffy star opines about the return

    Buffy the Vampire Slayer icon Sarah Michelle Gellar is opening up a bit more about the long-anticipated new chapter in the Buffyverse..

    According to Gellar, this project isn’t a reboot, and it isn’t quite a sequel either. It’s Buffy, but something different.


    Officially titled Buffy: New Sunnydale, the series will see Gellar, who starred as the Slayer for seven seasons, return in a guest capacity, passing the stake (so to speak) to a new generation. The new Slayer will be played by Ryan Kiera Armstrong, alongside a cast that includes Faly Rakotohavana (Unprisoned, Secret Society of Second Born Royals), Chase Sui Wonders (I Know What You Did Last Summer), Ava Jean (A Week Away, Law & Order: SVU), Sarah Bock (Severance), Daniel di Tomasso (Witches of East End, Major Crimes), and Jack Cutmore-Scott (Oppenheimer, Frasier).
    Speaking on the Shut Up, Evan podcast where she revealed the official title, Gellar clarified the show’s direction:
    “It’s not a sequel, it’s not a reboot — it’s a continuation.”


    She explained that the series will explore where Buffy is now, what kind of world she lives in today, and how that world exists both with her and without her.


      New Sunnydale sounds like it’s interested in legacy, in a very changed world since the show aired..


    If done right, this could be exactly what fans have hoped for: not nostalgia for nostalgia’s sake, but a smart evolution of one of television’s heroes .m

    But the real question now is will there be a musical.

  • Sydney Sweeney sleeper at box

    Sydney Sweeney sleeper at box

    The big winner of the box office numbers was 2025’s AVATAR and it is spreading its cash grab into 2026..

    James Cameron’s Avatar: Fire and Ash, which flew past the $1 billion mark at the global box office on Saturday, continues to dominate theaters..

    DEADLINE’s reporting has more numbers.. Avatar 3‘s global earnings through New Year’s Day (Thursday) were a mighty $935 million, including $266 million domestically and $699 overseas. On Friday, it earned another $14 million in North America from 3,832 theaters to finish the day with a domestic total of $280 million.

    Lionsgate and Paul Feig’s well-reviewed sleeper hit The Housemaid could fall just six percent to $14 million for a domestic tally nearing $75 million.. This is a success that Sweeney needed as she has been skewered in media since she did a jeans ad..

    Sweeney’s sleeper hit HOUSEMAID continues to get stronger and higher reviews from audiences that official reviewers.. Perhaps that ‘one scene’ has convinced many people to go see the film more than once..

  • THE 2025 YEAR IN REVIEW

    THE 2025 YEAR IN REVIEW

    LOOK AWAY!

    THE YEAR OF THE SNAKE

    2025 AND WHERE IT GOT US

    THE BEST AND WORST OF 2025

    THOSE WE LOST IN 2025

    AND… PREDICTIONS FOR 2026

    On the Chinese calendar, 2025 was the Year of the Snake, and it really did slither by—sometimes fast, sometimes painfully slow—but either way, it’s now come and gone.


    That brings us to our annual Year in Review, a tradition we’ve kept alive for more than 20 years. The good, the bad, and the ugly. What we lost, what stood out, the best and the worst of it all—and yes, our daring prognostications for the year ahead, along with a look back at what we predicted for this one.


    We’re all feeling a bit bleak right now. Let’s hope things get a little less Slytherin in ’26.

  • The ‘gory’ HOME ALONE spoof gets an age limit on YouTube

    The ‘gory’ HOME ALONE spoof gets an age limit on YouTube

    It was a little too much for Youtube apparently..

    Saturday Night Live’s alternate ending to Home Alone was apparently violent enough for NBC to add an additional flag to this weekend’s episode for “intense violence”—and to age-restrict the video on YouTube.

    SNL typically carries a TV-14 rating for “intensely suggestive dialogue” and “strong coarse language,” last Saturday’s broadcast saw the addition of a “V” symbol, noting “intense violence.”

    The sketch “Home Alone” imagined Ariana Grande as Macaulay Culkin’s Kevin McCallister. Putting a gory spin on the real film’s ending, the McCallister family’s return home devolves into extreme bloodshed when they encounter all of the traps that Kevin had previously set for the Wet Bandits. Among the injuries sustained: Fuller (Bowen Yang) gets both his arms sliced off by a chainsaw, Buzz (Colin Jost) is shredded head-to-toe by a box fan, while others are engulfed in flames. Though it’s all ultimately deemed to be imagined, Old Man Marley (Andrew Dismukes) winds up killing Kevin and his mother (Ashley Padilla) with a swing of his shovel.