Tag: m night shyamalan

  • Still seeing signs after 24 years

    Still seeing signs after 24 years

    It’s been 24 years since one of the most poignant movies we’ve ever seen was released.

    Signs, with Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix.

    Over the past 24 years, I can’t even describe how many times I’ve watched this movie. To the point where, probably 23 years ago, my VHS copy was basically ruined from overuse. Somewhere in this house there’s a DVD that probably has plenty of dust on it now, but also plenty of scratches from the number of times it was put into a DVD player.

    We’ve hunted down any place streaming it for free. We’ve rented it probably way too many times from various streaming services.

    The movie was something in 2002.. it had significance and a message and touched on a connection between people…

    We are not a stranger to the critique that the graphics at the end are goofy.. the CGI alien imagery hasn’t exactly aged gracefully. We know people laugh at the water falling onto the alien’s shoulder. The movie has been mocked, parodied and satirized plenty of times since 2002.

    But in 2002, Signs was the Horror Report Movie of the Year.

    Here is a snippet of we immaturely said that year:

    You had to be there.

    You have to remember the context in which Signs arrived. M. Night Shyamalan had already given us The Sixth Sense, one of the greatest box-office sleeper stories of its time and a movie that completely changed the conversation around him.

    The entire country was talking about The Sixth Sense.

    And here’s something else that’s almost quaint to remember now: people actually tried not to ruin the ending. People enthusiastically wanted their friends and family to experience that ending in a theater the same way they did. Unless you went searching around the internet for somebody willing to spoil it, we somehow managed to remain relatively spoiler-free.

    Shyamalan followed The Sixth Sense with Unbreakable and then, in 2002, came Signs.

    And he used some of that same magic again. Except the ending of Signs wasn’t really about delivering another giant twist. It was something more meaningful.

    Yes, Signs is technically about an alien invasion of planet Earth and one small family’s fight inside a farmhouse outside Philadelphia to survive it.

    There are frightening images. There are jump scares. There’s an alien walking past a birthday party that probably scared the living hell out of plenty of people sitting in theaters in 2002.

    But if you’re watching Signs today simply for the jump scares or the alien effects, you’re probably going to be disappointed.

    Because that’s not really what the movie is about.

    It’s about a minister who loses his faith after his wife dies through what seems like the cruelest possible act of random fate.

    It’s about Joaquin Phoenix’s Merrill Hess, a man who once seemed destined for something greater but never quite got there. He had talent. He had promise. He had baseball. And now he’s working at a gas station and living with his brother.

    It’s about two children traumatized by the death of their mother, trying to understand their own grief while simultaneously watching their father transform into a different, almost unrecognizable version of himself. And in the middle of all of this, aliens invade Earth.

    The alien invasion is the metaphorical backdrop for everything else happening inside that farmhouse.

    Coincidences that might not be coincidences and faith lost and eventually rediscovered. Trauma, with grief and regret, all get incorporated..

    The question of whether the terrible and seemingly random things that happen to us have some meaning that we simply can’t see while we’re living through them.

    And how you keep the light on when the world around you suddenly seems filled with shadows.

    There’s another piece of the history that shouldn’t be forgotten.

    Signs was made in the shadow of September 11, 2001.

    The movie was being made during that period, and the bonus documentary material released with the film even captured members of the production discussing what it was like when 9/11 happened. As a matter of fact, filming started on September 12, 2001..

    It’s difficult to explain to someone who wasn’t old enough to experience that period just how much 9/11 permeated almost everything afterward.

    Movies. Television. Music. News. Conversations. Families. Fear.

    The country had suddenly experienced the horrifying realization that something almost unimaginable could happen on an otherwise normal morning.

    And then Signs came along with a family standing inside a farmhouse, watching television and listening to the radio as something unimaginable happened to the entire world outside.

    I don’t think you can completely separate those things.

    Maybe that’s one reason the movie hit so differently in 2002.

    And now 24 years have passed.

    We recently went back and watched Signs again. It’s currently streaming on Apple TV—which we’ll call “free” with the obvious asterisk that you have to pay for Apple TV to get that particular version of free.

    And boy, does 2002 look like 2002.

    There are VHS tapes and VCRs. Old baby monitors become an important piece of technology. There aren’t smartphones constantly buzzing with notifications. Nobody is refreshing social media looking for the newest shaky alien video.

    Instead, our protagonists watch television and listen to the radio to find out whether the world is ending.

    Of course things would be different today.

    But strangely enough, the important things wouldn’t be.

    Because Signs is grounded in something that technology hasn’t really changed.

    It’s not simply a horror movie.

    It’s a deeply profound story about a spiritual awakening during a horrific moment.

    Kind of like 9/11.

    And kind of like life itself for a lot of people.

    Over the past 24 years, I’ve told countless people to watch Signs. I don’t know how many actually listened. I don’t know how many watched it and thought I was crazy for loving it so much.

    That’s okay.

    I’ve also remained loyal to Shyamalan through some of the years when seemingly everybody else decided they were done with him.

    We’ve even told countless people to watch Lady in the Water, another movie people dismiss because they think the premise is goofy or the story is strange.

    But Lady in the Water tells you what it is. It’s a bedtime story.

    And underneath that strange bedtime story is another profoundly human idea about trauma—how it changes a person, how it can change the soul and how accepting what happened to you can become part of reclaiming your identity.

    Maybe that’s why these movies have stuck with me.

    Because Signs, to some degree, healed me in 2002.

    And for the past 24 years, I’ve gone back to it during moments when I needed some spiritual healing or maybe just an awakening.

    I know.

    It’s just a movie.

    But after watching it this many times over this many years, there’s still something nagging at my mind.

    If an alien invasion ever really happened, maybe the aliens really would be stupid enough to invade a planet covered in the one substance capable of killing them.

    Maybe water really would do it.

    Who knows.

    But something else seems far more believable.

    If an alien invasion happened today, there would be families inside farmhouses, apartments and homes across the world going through exactly the same struggle as the Hess family.

    Because right now there are already plenty of people fighting profoundly deep battles trying to figure out who they are, what they believe and how to put themselves back together after something changed them.

    Twenty-four years of technological advancement hasn’t changed that.

    Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix’s characters didn’t have smartphones, social media or most of our modern conveniences.

    But they had exactly the same emotions we have today.

    Trauma and heartbreak.

    Fear and hopelessness.

    Resilience and courage.

    And the desperate search for some kind of meaning in the face of an earth-shattering crisis.

    That’s what Signs is.

    So watch it again.

    Don’t worry about whether the CGI alien looks convincing in 2026.

    Look at the people inside the farmhouse instead. And maybe see if you can reclaim a little bit of the spirit you had when you first watched it all those years ago.

    And if you’re watching Signs for the first time?

    This is what we said about the movie during our “movie of the year post” 24 short years ago, without grammar corrected 🙂 :

    Priests are scandalous all around us. Elders are corrupting minors. Television ads are selling sex to children. Government is selling our secrecy for safety and we let them. Politicians who lie and cheat and steal to get their positions of power are corrupting institutions of power we once respected because our founding father gave us a reason to. We have no heroes anymore, we, often times and in many individual cases, have nothing to have faith in. SIGNS illustrates to us that faith has faith in us to make the right choice, to see the signs. A glass of water is half full. In this film it matters.

    Everything matters. It’s the ultimate message for life Shaymalan wanted to send. It’s also the ultimate reason I chose this film as the movie of the year. It gave me a glimmer of hope. It made me wonder. It made me think about things in a different way. It filled me with spirit, I left the film each time feeling more faithful and spiritual than any church service on earth can make me. I saw the SIGNS. I just hope I never close my eyes again.

    HORROR-REPORT’S FILM OF THE YEAR 2002: SIGNS

    Don’t watch it as a 24-year-old alien movie whose special effects you’re supposed to judge against what Hollywood can create today.

    Watch it as a story about people trying to survive something they don’t understand.

    Maybe, somewhere in their struggle, you’ll recognize a little bit of your own.

    And maybe you’ll find one of the signs you’ve been looking for.

  • Box office TRAPPED with DEADPOOL and WOVLERINE..  M Night hopes for $15 mil

    Box office TRAPPED with DEADPOOL and WOVLERINE.. M Night hopes for $15 mil

    ROTTEN on TOMATOES..
    Variety hits: ‘Trap’ Review: Josh Hartnett Plays a Serial Killer in an M. Night Shyamalan Thriller Where Each Twist is More Contrived Than the Last
    Meagan Navvaro positive review..

    DEADPOOL AND WOLVERINE will stay strong.. Shyamalan hoping for a $15 mil opening.. developing..

    BOX OFFICE TRAP: 48% ROTTEN SCORE; M NIGHT AND HARTNETT FILM BEING CALLED A JUMBLED MESS

    THIS IS DEVELOPING..

  • M Night Shyamalan ad premiers during Super Bowl: Promises of “only in theaters” this summer

    M Night Shyamalan ad premiers during Super Bowl: Promises of “only in theaters” this summer

    The trailer promised “only in theaters” this summer…

    Some wondered.. what is a theater.
    Nonetheless, the new Shyamalan film’s trailer appeared in the early portion of the Super Bowl on CBS..

    The movie is called OLD.

    Starring Gael García Beral (Mozart in the Jungle) and Vicky Krieps (Phantom Thread), the film is reportedly based on Sandcastle, a graphic novel by Pierre Oscar Levy. The story focuses on a family’s trip to a beach, and the dark secrets they discover behind its corners.

    It’s unclear how faithfully Shyamalan’s movie adapts the Levy story, but in the trailer, we get the beach, the family, and true to the director’s horror-thriller roots, a supernatural turn of events.

    Old is among a wave of new films shot under strict set guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic…

  • This is a good article about the reason THE VISIT did NOT suck

    This is a good article about the reason THE VISIT did NOT suck

    This is a good article about the reason THE VISIT did NOT suck

    M Night gets an unfair shake so many times over.. Even with the VISIT. I saw it and loved it.. But I loved some of the other films people called stinkers. But I do think THE VISIT was just fine, just completely fine.

  • M NIGHT not so Wayward in new show

    M NIGHT not so Wayward in new show

    Director M. Night Shyamalan poses for portrait during the 2015 Comic-Con International Convention in San Diego, California July 9, 2015. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni
    Director M. Night Shyamalan poses for portrait during the 2015 Comic-Con International Convention in San Diego, California July 9, 2015. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

    For years, the legendary M Night Shyamalan has lost his luster.. gone were the hits and surprise endings.. And in were the critics who slammed him for lame story lines and hackneyed tales and fables.

    WAYWARD PINES was different..
    Since the inception of the show, ratings were strong.

    Viewers seemingly have become content with NIGHT’s PINES after ten episodes–something people were pondering, would viewers accept his style after so many busts at the box office..? They did.

    The program has already covered Blake Crouch’s entire trilogy.. But rumors persist: If FOX wants more, there are ideas..  There are also rumored ‘preliminary’ discussions about the program and whether more are coming..

    FOX may see ratings and get ideas. The series began strong–and ended strong. The show was strong throughout the duration.. TVSERIESFINALE.COM has the numbers proving success.. there were only two weeks where large drop offs took place. Otherwise, the final show soared 22%..

    x x x

    The success of WAYWARD PINES is fueling hopes in the Shyamalan camp that the pesky movies some former fans called atrocities in cinema may be behind him. Things like THE VILLAGE, LADY IN THE WATER, and THE HAPPENING–though I have professed  my fondness on a number of occasions for all three aforementioned non-hits.

    This fall, September 11 to be exact, THE VISIT will premiere in theaters..
    To what audiences?
    To what money?
    To what success or lukewarm response?

    Time will tell.

    But I think the M NIGHT name may be stronger than the weakest moments. People are fond of THE SIXTH SENSE and SIGNS. That is how we got to know Shaymalan. And all those others are forgivable.

    In the movie business, directors get second chances. In this case, perhaps 5th chances.

    After WAYWARD PINES, newfound respect is being given to Shyamalan–perhaps enough respect that he will end up with a season 2 along with a hit autumn chiller..

  • M. Night Shyamalan: People pleasing can be dangerous

    M. Night Shyamalan: People pleasing can be dangerous

    M. Night Shyamalan: People pleasing can be dangerous

    Your movies can please some of the people some of the time.
    But LADY IN THE WATER, THE HAPPENING, and THE VILLAGE will please none of the people all of the time…

  • M. Night Shyamalan Ruined The ‘Independence Day’ Sequel For Will Smith

    M. Night Shyamalan Ruined The ‘Independence Day’ Sequel For Will Smith

    M. Night Shyamalan Ruined The ‘Independence Day’ Sequel For Will Smith

    Roland Emmerich on why Will Smith isn’t considering it, two words and an initial : M Night Shayamalan.

    ““In the very beginning, I wanted to work with him and he was excited to be in it but then after a while he was tired of sequels, and he did another science fiction film, which was his father-son story, so he opted out.”

  • M NIGHT 2.0?

    M NIGHT 2.0?

    For years,  M Night Shyalaman has been equally regarded as a genius and washed up director.. Fans love him. Critics hate him.. a new movie coming out this fall called THE VISIT, at least according to Jason Blum, may help some get restored faith in NIGHT.. 

    Blum said, 

    “And I think when you see “The Visit,” and when people see “The Visit,” they’ll see it’s — you know, he’s really back to — it feels like one of his earlier movies, and it really feels like one of the Night films that made him who he is. It’s really scary, and really gets under your skin. It’s more of a…thriller, but it’s a terrific movie, I’m really proud of it. And I’m even prouder of it that…I think people will be very pleasantly surprised by it.”

  • THE NIGHT RETURNS: But will the new Hitchcock or laughing stock show up?

    THE NIGHT RETURNS: But will the new Hitchcock or laughing stock show up?

    M NIGHT SHYAMALAN is back with a ten episode miniseries set to air tonight, THURSDAY at 9pm edt..

    The long anticipated program, WAYWARD PINES, is promising typical plot twists in the M NIGHT style.. But the question will now be: Will viewers appreciate it after all of the duds that people have attributed to the Shyamalan name..?

    Matt Dillon stars as a Secret Service agent who arrives in a tiny, picturesque Idaho town (that could be called Creepyville, USA) to investigate a case, but learns he can’t leave. No one can. If people try to escape, it can deadly..

    Cast members also include Terrence Howard, Melissa Leo, Toby Jones and Juliette Lewis. Shyamalan said that after casting Dillon, it was Leo’s role that helped shape his vision of the series.

    The UK GUARDIAN took the chance to profile Shyalaman as he leaps from movies to television (but back to movies this fall with the VISIT)..  The report points out that the director went to a celebrated new version of Hitchcock to a laughing stock..  Which version shows up for WAYWARD is yet to be seen–but even more interesting will be the ratings game.

    The NIGHT brand has been acclaimed before it turned lame. Movies like SIXTH SENSE were forgotten by the time THE HAPPENING didn’t happen–ironically the bee collapse is in the news today. Maybe we should have listened closer in 2008.. Regardless, Night is coming back this fall with THE VISIT. The trailer for that movie about people going to their grandparents house in Pennsylvania has already become the butt of jokes.. 
    WAYWARD PINES seems immune to such unkind words. As a matter of fact, the reviews appear to be mostly positive–helped more by Matt Dillon as an actor than M Night as a creator..
    But time will tell how WAYWARD these pines get.

    10 episodes begins tonight..
    Will you stay for all of them?